Rambus And NVIDIA Bury The Hatchet, Sign 5 Year Agreement

by Ryan Smith on 2/9/2012 10:53:00 AM
Posted in Memory , Rambus , nvidia

While Rambus has settled in one form or another with most of the major players in the computing industry, one of the remaining holdouts has been NVIDIA. NVIDIA has already lost to Rambus in court over some infringement cases, while cases over other products and patents have been ongoing. As a chipset, SoC, and GPU provider, NVIDIA has a particularly wide exposure to memory-related suits as virtually all of their products contain a memory controller of some kind, giving them ample reason to continue fighting Rambus.

But that fight has finally come to an end. Yesterday Rambus and NVIDIA signed a 5 year licensing agreement, under which NVIDIA gets rights to Rambus's patented technologies, and at the same time both companies drop all outstanding suits aimed at each other. As with other Rambus licensing agreements the specific terms of the deal are private, so how much NVIDIA is paying per the agreement and whether there is a per-product royalty rate attached is unknown.

It's interesting to note though that this comes so soon after two major Rambus losses. In November Rambus lost a major antitrust case against Hynix and Micron, meanwhile in January of this year the United States Patent and Trademark Office ruled that 3 of Rambus's major patents (the Barth patents) were invalid. The Barth patents have been Rambus's biggest weapons, and they were the patents that defeated NVIDIA in the infringement suit that NVIDIA previously lost. Given the timing of this latest settlement, it stands to reason that a weakened Rambus was willing to settle with NVIDIA on far more favorable terms - to the point where it would be cheaper than continuing the suit - but as the terms of the deal are not public we'll never know for sure.

In any case, with NVIDIA finally settling there are now only a few smaller holdouts remaining. The Wall Street Journal names the remaining parties as LSI Corp (storage controllers, including SandForce), MediaTek (SoCs), and STMicro (everything from SoCs to ICs).

Source: The Wall Street Journal

Print This Article 16 Comments View All Comments Post a Comment Now... by ananduser on Thursday, February 09, 2012 ...if only Apple took a page from Rambus' experience. ananduser Reply RE: Now... by tayb on Thursday, February 09, 2012 I would not. Why would I want to license my patented technology to a competitor? I would rather be the sole offering in the market and send them back to the drawing board.

Of course, regulatory boards would probably step in and stop me... but I would not do it willingly. And if you were the owner of a business I doubt you would either. tayb Reply RE: Now... by Exodite on Thursday, February 09, 2012 This is why we can't have nice things. Exodite Reply RE: Now... by tayb on Thursday, February 09, 2012 We can't have nice things because I fronted the research costs and would like some semblance of exclusivity on a market I essentially created? You are more than welcome to bring a competing offering but abusing my research costs, launching a competing offering at a lower price (because you don't have research costs to recoup), and then hoping I'll settle for an insignificant licensing fee at a later date is not at all fair in my opinion. tayb Reply RE: Now... by FaaR on Thursday, February 09, 2012 What exactly is it you claim Rambus researched? It's been well established pretty much all they've sued people over is stuff presented in open standards talks that they've snuck out the back door, patented and backdated to a previous patent, then surprised everyone else with. FaaR Reply RE: Now... by tayb on Thursday, February 09, 2012 This is more of an hypothetical than a real world take on the Apple or Rambus situation. I don't really know enough about either of those suits and the patents involved to have a meaningful dialogue. I'm speaking in generalities here. tayb Reply RE: Now... by dcollins on Thursday, February 09, 2012 You're right in concept. The only problem is that patents are granted for far too long. If you invented some awesome technology, you should be the first to bring your product to market, but you do not deserve to own that market forever. Technology patents should expire in at most 5 years, probably 3 years. dcollins Reply RE: Now... by tayb on Friday, February 10, 2012 I think it should be 5 years for the patent and then it enters a FRAND-esque state for 4 more years and then it is considered "prior art" and anyone can use it. tayb Reply RE: Now... by B3an on Thursday, February 09, 2012 Hi there, i work for Apple.

You have used the letter "i"' far too much in your comment. Your IP has been tracked and we will be taking you to court. If you are not aware, we invented the letter "i" and own a patent on it.

@Anand, this site has rounded corners on a few of the buttons. We own a patent on rounded corners. We also invented them. If you remember everything before the 1980's was actually square until we brought forth this original innovation. Please correct these rounded corners within 15 days. B3an Reply RE: Now... by retrospooty on Thursday, February 09, 2012 LOL... Dont for get that Apple also patented the shape of a rectangle, as well as the colors black and white. retrospooty Reply Subject Comment Post Comment Please login or register to post a comment.
User Name Password Remember me? Login 1 2 Next » View All Comments Post a Comment Follow AnandTech
Latest from AnandTech Pipeline Submit News! HTC Announces Initial Ice Cream Sandwich Rollout Plans Windows 8 Consumer Preview Event Scheduled For Feb 29 Google Chrome 17 Hits Stable Channel More Sandy Bridge E Laptops: Eurocom Panther 4.0 and Maingear Titan 17 AMD Releases Two Llano Based Athlon II X4 CPUs Hitachi Releases Ultrastar SSD400S.B: 25nm SLC NAND Is Here Firmware Updates Bring Lion Internet Recovery to 2010 Macs Google Releases Chrome For Android - Updated Intel Updates Sandy Bridge Graphics Drivers Nokia Announces White Lumia 800 Droid 4 Available February 10th for $199 DailyTech Intel Settles '09 NY Antitrust Case for Only 5 Hours Worth of its Yearly Profit AT&T Doubles Smartphone Upgrade Fee to $36 After Disastrous Q4 2/10/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Motorola Fails to Score the Hat Trick, Losing to Apple at Last in Germany Georgia Tech Uses Shape-Memory Alloys to Create Earthquake-Resistant Buildings Report: Apple to Debut iPad 3 During First Week of March Tesla Motors Unveils All-Electric "Model X' Crossover Hackers Have Their Way With Apple Supplier Foxconn German Appeals Court Approves Galaxy 10.1N, Tells Apple "Deal With It" Google's Motorola Mobility Purchase Approval Expected Next Week Quick Note: Kodak Bails on Digital Camera Market 2/9/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Hackers Mug Google's Wallet App on Rooted Android Devices Google Drive Cloud Storage Service to Launch "Soon" Lenovo Announces Q3 Financials, Posts Record Profit Activist Groups Protest Apple Stores in Name of Supplier Worker Treatment in China Toyota's 50MPG Prius c Hybrid to Start at $18,950 Twitter @marcreichman what's insane is that you can get that much compute in blades now as well @anshelsag haha yeah, too late, clicked the wrong button :) Will be doing power and perf comparison between the old and new configs over the coming weeks. For now, it's bedtime That was high-end back in 2006 - 8 cores in a 4U box, now we have 12 in a 2U box Finally carried our old DB server up to the lab: four socket, dual-core Opteron 880 based HP ProLiant DL585 http://t.co/ftyi8BPF @ozym4ndias @wilshipley @pmod not really, not internal at least. here's a hint: http://t.co/iv6wXn7I :) @RandomMegaBytes the 512GB drive won't actually update to the latest firmware, but the 128/256GB drives are very quick @pmod IVB gives you the same memory bandwidth as SNB, likely see DDR3-1600 in mobile @wilshipley @pmod remember with Ivy Bridge TDPs don't actually go down, in 2013 that will change though... @wilshipley @pmod The Pro won't go away entirely, but we will see a trend towards thinner notebooks in general.  

Copyright © 1997-2012 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information