AMD Releases Two Llano Based Athlon II X4 CPUs

by Kristian Vättö on 2/8/2012 1:39:00 PM
Posted in CPUs , AMD , Llano

AMD has quietly released two Athlon II X4 CPUs, the 638 and 641. These are based on Llano (i.e. Stars+/K10.5 architecture) but lack an integrated GPU. The socket is still FM1, just like in normal Llano CPUs. Here's a quick rundown of the chips.

Specifications of AMD Athlon II X4 638 and 641Model638641Core/Thread Count4/44/4Base Frequency2.7GHz2.8GHzL2 Cache4MB4MBTDP65W100WPrice$81$81

There is nothing extraordinaty in these chips. We are looking at relatively low-end SKUs in terms of price and performance. It's good to keep in mind that a discrete GPU is needed because these SKUs lack integrated graphics, so that will potentially raise the total system price.

The usage of the Athlon II brand with Llano isn't actually a new thing as the first such SKU, Athlon II X4 631, launched back in August. This is quite similar to what Intel is doing; AMD is saving the A4, A6, A8, and FX brands (their rough equivalent of Intel's Core i3/i5/i7) for midrange and high-end chips, and reusing their older Sempron and Athlon brand names (e.g. Intel's Celeron and Pentium) with lower-end SKUs.

Source: CPU-World

Print This Article 12 Comments View All Comments Post a Comment Price? by tipoo on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 Are both really the same price? And how does the TDP go up 35W just from a .1GHz bump? tipoo Reply RE: Price? by Kristian Vättö on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 I know, it makes no sense at all. Maybe the 638 is a higher binned chip with lower power consumption, though it should cost more then.

However, remember that TDP is the maximum power consumption (well, not maximum but what you would experience under commercial load) so while there is 35W difference, it may not be that big in the real world. Kristian Vättö Reply RE: Price? by RU482 on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 They probably weren't designed this way, but rather are derived from higher end parts that failed certain parts of the qual test. RU482 Reply RE: Price? by JarredWalton on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 Higher power, slightly higher clock speed, same price -- makes sense to me. Most likely these parts are something specific OEMs are interested in selling (e.g. they have some old HD 5470 GPUs to pair them with or something). I personally wouldn't want either one, as Llano without the IGP is rather silly, but to each his own. JarredWalton Reply RE: Price? by Kristian Vättö on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 It's just odd that for 3.7% increase in frequency, the TDP goes up by 53.8%. Of course, TDP is just a directional number like I said, not really an accurate indication of the power consumption. Kristian Vättö Reply RE: Price? by tpurves on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 These just look like AMD offloading partly working GPU-defective A-series parts onto the OEM market. Chips that have a CPU but not an APU that works get the lower TDP part. Chips that fail at a working GPU AND fail at meeting power/speedbin targets get dumped as the high TDP part. tpurves Reply RE: Price? by silverblue on Thursday, February 09, 2012 The TDP isn't going to be indicative of the actual usage; I'm unsure as to why AMD didn't revise that figure, unless the GPU part still uses power much like the 5830 using more power than the 5850 even with some parts disabled. silverblue Reply RE: Price? by MrSpadge on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 The 641 probably uses 70 - 75 W, if the 638 uses 65 W. More important here is that AMD doesn't guarantee it's not going to draw more - they could sell any crap using this sticker. Fair deal. MrSpadge Reply "these SKUs lack integrated graphics, so that will potentially raise the total system price" by Belard on Wednesday, February 08, 2012 Huh?

The AMD A8-3850 Llano 2.9GHz costs about $130, its 100Mhz more than the AII X4-641 which is $81~85. The cost of the built-in GPU is added to the costs.... duh.

The price difference is $50. The HD 6570 128bit video card is $45~65 will smoke the built-in GPU.

So the price difference is nominal. Especially if the person wants to add a GPU card anyway. In which case, they should really pay the $20 extra costs for an FX-4100 3.6Ghz 95w CPU.

AMD has issues it cross-over products. the 8MB of L3 cache is missing on Llano. The Unlocked A-38xx is just as dumb. Its a $140 CPU that doesn't have the OC headroom of an FX Chip... Belard Reply Video-less A8 repurposing, no doubt by Ethaniel on Thursday, February 09, 2012 If I remember correctly, the A8-3800 (65w) works at 2.7 Ghz in Turbo mode, while the A8-3850 (100w) works at 2.9 Ghz without Turbo. So, the 638 looks like a A8-3800 in "sustained Turbo" (I guess the lack of functional video allows that), and the 641 is a A8-3850 dropped to 2.8 Ghz. Makes me remember those i486SX with a broken FPU. Damn, I'm old. Ethaniel Reply Subject Comment Post Comment Please login or register to post a comment.
User Name Password Remember me? Login 1 2 Next » View All Comments Post a Comment Follow AnandTech
Latest from AnandTech Pipeline Submit News! HTC Announces Initial Ice Cream Sandwich Rollout Plans Rambus And NVIDIA Bury The Hatchet, Sign 5 Year Agreement Windows 8 Consumer Preview Event Scheduled For Feb 29 Google Chrome 17 Hits Stable Channel More Sandy Bridge E Laptops: Eurocom Panther 4.0 and Maingear Titan 17 Hitachi Releases Ultrastar SSD400S.B: 25nm SLC NAND Is Here Firmware Updates Bring Lion Internet Recovery to 2010 Macs Google Releases Chrome For Android - Updated Intel Updates Sandy Bridge Graphics Drivers Nokia Announces White Lumia 800 Droid 4 Available February 10th for $199 DailyTech Intel Settles '09 NY Antitrust Case for Only 5 Hours Worth of its Yearly Profit AT&T Doubles Smartphone Upgrade Fee to $36 After Disastrous Q4 2/10/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Motorola Fails to Score the Hat Trick, Losing to Apple at Last in Germany Georgia Tech Uses Shape-Memory Alloys to Create Earthquake-Resistant Buildings Report: Apple to Debut iPad 3 During First Week of March Tesla Motors Unveils All-Electric "Model X' Crossover Hackers Have Their Way With Apple Supplier Foxconn German Appeals Court Approves Galaxy 10.1N, Tells Apple "Deal With It" Google's Motorola Mobility Purchase Approval Expected Next Week Quick Note: Kodak Bails on Digital Camera Market 2/9/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Hackers Mug Google's Wallet App on Rooted Android Devices Google Drive Cloud Storage Service to Launch "Soon" Lenovo Announces Q3 Financials, Posts Record Profit Activist Groups Protest Apple Stores in Name of Supplier Worker Treatment in China Toyota's 50MPG Prius c Hybrid to Start at $18,950 Twitter @marcreichman what's insane is that you can get that much compute in blades now as well @anshelsag haha yeah, too late, clicked the wrong button :) Will be doing power and perf comparison between the old and new configs over the coming weeks. For now, it's bedtime That was high-end back in 2006 - 8 cores in a 4U box, now we have 12 in a 2U box Finally carried our old DB server up to the lab: four socket, dual-core Opteron 880 based HP ProLiant DL585 http://t.co/ftyi8BPF @ozym4ndias @wilshipley @pmod not really, not internal at least. here's a hint: http://t.co/iv6wXn7I :) @RandomMegaBytes the 512GB drive won't actually update to the latest firmware, but the 128/256GB drives are very quick @pmod IVB gives you the same memory bandwidth as SNB, likely see DDR3-1600 in mobile @wilshipley @pmod remember with Ivy Bridge TDPs don't actually go down, in 2013 that will change though... @wilshipley @pmod The Pro won't go away entirely, but we will see a trend towards thinner notebooks in general.  

Copyright © 1997-2012 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information