AMD Clarifies 7000M Strategy

by Jarred Walton on 1/14/2012 9:12:00 PM
Posted in Trade Shows , CES , CES 2012 , AMD , 7000M , GCN , Trinity

CES has wrapped up now and we’re all back home, but we’ve still got a few items to cover. While Anand was meeting with AMD on Thursday to go over some other their other tech, I got a chance to head into a separate area for a briefing on their mobile technology. There are two items I want to quickly discuss: the Radeon 7000M lineup, and Trinity.

We’ve already covered some of the 7000M parts that will ship in the very near future—quite a few laptops at CES were running these “new” GPUs. The 7400M, 7500M, and 7600M are all VLIW5 parts, which we’ve called “rebadged” GPUs. AMD pointed out (and we at agree at least in part) that calling these rebadged GPUs is a bit too harsh—reused or recycled might be a better term, particularly if you’re into the whole “green” thing. But seriously, the latest 7000M GPUs aren’t just a straight rerelease of the same silicon under a new name; we’ve pointed out in the past that as time passes, companies become more familiar with a process technology, both on the fabricator side and on the chip designer side. This is why initial 40nm GPUs don’t offer all the performance and features of later model 40nm GPUs for example. AMD didn’t specifically state that the 7400M/7500M/7600M will use a new revision/spin of the existing Northern Islands cores, but it was at least implied, and it’s likely that we’ll see slightly better performance and power characteristics out of the latest batch. You can see the released specs and expected performance in the gallery below.

Gallery:

Okay, that’s part one of the 7000M strategy: reuse the existing Northern Islands family to occupy the value and mainstream price segments. The second part of the strategy, we don’t have any specifics to reveal in terms of specs, but AMD did let us know one important piece of information. They have in essence drawn a line in the sand (e.g. in their product portfolio), and everything 7600M and below will reuse their existing 40nm VLIW5 architecture while all of the yet-to-be-announced parts above 7600M (7700M/7800M/7900M) will switch to 28nm GCN (Graphics Core Next). It sounds like the mobile GPUs will use lower power variants of “Pitcairn” and “Cape Verde”, leaving “Tahiti” as a desktop-only GPU for the time being, but features like DX11.1, VCE, and ZeroCore Power Technology will be present in the higher performance 7000M parts when they launch. And just when will that be? AMD wouldn’t give us a date, but all indications are we’ll see the 7000M Southern Islands GPUs in the April/May timeframe.

AMD had a couple of laptops (okay, monstrous DTR beasts really) running in their booth to show that they had working silicon for both classes of 7000M hardware. Both notebooks are Clevo X7200 units using desktop CPUs, so they’re more proof of concept than something that most people are going to buy, but they were both happily running 3D applications. The notebook on the left has a single HD 7690M running a custom AMD demo, while the notebook on the right has CrossFire high-end 7000M hardware (presumably something in the HD 7900M class) running Aliens Vs. Predator 2.

Finally, a few people continue to ask questions about Trinity hardware. Obviously Trinity was running in a couple demonstrations, but AMD is not yet disclosing the full hardware specs. Some have speculated that Trinity will have a GCN-based graphics core, but if you stop to think about it for a minute that’s obviously not going to happen. GCN is coming out on TSMC’s 28nm process technology while Trinity will use GLOBALFOUNDRIES’ 32nm process; as AMD is busy trying to work on the improved Bulldozer cores in Trinity along with upgrading the GPU, trying to bring GCN into the mix would seriously delay the whole process. The short story is that AMD (again) confirmed that Trinity is using a VLIW4 core for graphics, and it offers enhanced performance relative to the core in Llano. We’ll hopefully have final hardware in hand in the next few months to provide the full performance analysis.

Print This Article 15 Comments View All Comments Post a Comment bad for the uninformed by djc208 on Saturday, January 14, 2012 The thing I hate about this kind of Mobil strategy is that without doing your homework the average person isn't going to know that one number difference in their laptop could make a big difference in graphics performance and longevity. djc208 Reply RE: bad for the uninformed by GenSozo on Saturday, January 14, 2012 In addition to that, I'm a mainstream buyer who does my homework, and I'm not going to pay the big bucks (or medium bucks, as the case may be) for last gen, rehashed hardware, no matter how they spitshine it. On principle, at the very least. GenSozo Reply VLIW4 is going to crossfire with a VLIW5? by Roland00Address on Saturday, January 14, 2012 So is amd going to release any VLIW4 discrete graphics to crossfire with the trinity gpu? Or is a VLIW4 going to crossfire with a VLIW5? Or is amd just going to drop APU+DGPU crossfire with trinity? Roland00Address Reply RE: VLIW4 is going to crossfire with a VLIW5? by JarredWalton on Sunday, January 15, 2012 Asymmetrical CrossFire is exactly that: different GPUs that still manage to (sort of, in theory) work together. That's actually the big hurdle to overcome, and I'd imagine it's why my initial testing of Llano's CrossFire with 6630M didn't pan out so well. Llano is 400 cores and 6630M is 480 cores, so I imagine ACF with VLIW4 and VLIW5 wouldn't be all that different. Here's to hoping ACF works (a lot) better when Trinity launches. JarredWalton Reply VLIW5 by AlB80 on Sunday, January 15, 2012 1. VLIW5 32-bit is a very effective architecture.
2. I think Trinity will be VLIW4 32-bit (Cayman has 64-bit support). And AMD will find solution to glue VLIW4 and VLIW5 parts in Xfire. AlB80 Reply rebadge/reuse/recycle by bennyg on Sunday, January 15, 2012 Smart-bummed wordsmithery does not change that a minor respin being deliberately associated with the next Gen of cards is flat out dishonest.

And surely nvidia would get the lawyers onto them super quick as soon if they ever said the word "green" in relation to graphics cards :-) bennyg Reply Just give me TB port and external GPU... by XZerg on Sunday, January 15, 2012 I don't care what kinda shitty options they provide as long as the laptop manufacturers have a TB port and there are solutions out to exploit the PCIe bus to use external switchable desktop GPU. Sure not the perfect beat the internals in performance but the other benefits more than make up for the slow performance. XZerg Reply RE: Just give me TB port and external GPU... by bennyg on Sunday, January 15, 2012 Yep I agree completely. But both sides would be doing themselves out of expensive mobile gpu sales... I think theyd rather sell a GF114 as a 580M rather than a 560Ti, and a Barts as a 6970M not 6870. The difference is many hundreds in RRP alone. bennyg Reply RE: Just give me TB port and external GPU... by JarredWalton on Monday, January 16, 2012 External GPUs via Thunderbolt may not have a fast enough interface bandwidth. Remember that a single x16 PCIe 2.0 connection can push 8GB/s (80Gbps with 8/10 encoding); PCIe 3.0 will be double that with ~16GB/s in each direction (128Gbps with 128/130 encoding). Thunderbolt is up to 10Gbps in each direction, which is only 1.25GB/s; even with two TB connections you're still only getting about a fourth of the bandwidth of an x16 PCIe 2.0 connection. JarredWalton Reply RE: Just give me TB port and external GPU... by DanNeely on Monday, January 16, 2012 A PCIe2.0 x4 equivalent is consistently fast enough for gaming. A 1x is not (the ~30% average slowdown consists of some games taking no penalty and others suffering as much as a 75% drop in FPS). Unfortunately TechPowerUp didn't test 2x bandwidth; I'm guessing they only did physical slot testing instead of the tape the contacts method needed to get a 2x effective slot in a desktop.

http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/HD_5870_PCI... DanNeely Reply Subject Comment Post Comment Please login or register to post a comment.
User Name Password Remember me? Login 1 2 Next » View All Comments Post a Comment Follow AnandTech
Latest from AnandTech Pipeline Submit News! MIPS Technologies Targets Mobile Push Alienware's X51 is Coming CyanogenMod Team Shows Ice Cream Sandwich Running on HP TouchPad Microsoft's ReFS Filesystem for Windows 8 Server Explained AppliedMicro Demonstrates Catalina Based Platforms Sony VAIO: Z with Dock, SE with IPS, and an Ultrabook Concept Hands on with Samsung's Line of New Notebooks Sony Shows Off VAIO Slider Concept Why Thunderbolt Won't Come to the iPhone Anytime Soon Crucial Provides a Firmware Update for M4 to Fix The BSOD Issue IDT at CES : Touchscreen Controllers and Display Port Solutions DailyTech Rupert Murdoch, Congress Revive SOPA, Look to Ruin Superbowl Weekend Iran Mocks U.S. With Toy Version of Downed Spy Drone, Reserves Pink One for Obama Co-Founder Jerry Yang Finally Quits Yahoo for Good Samsung to Invest ~$42B USD in 2012 -- Mostly on Chipmaking, OLED TVs UPDATED: AMD Plots Thunderbolt Competitor "Lightning Bolt"; Greenlights External GPU China Boasts 513 Million Web Users 1/17/2012 Daily Hardware Reviews Windows Server 8 Scraps Part of NTFS Base Code, Gets B+ (And That's Good) Samsung SUR40 Surface 2.0 Ships this Month Woz: I Wish My iPhone Did All The Things My Android Does SpaceX Delays Dragon's First Launch to ISS Apple Dusts Itself Off and Tries Again, Targets 10 Samsung Smartphones in Germany Pentagon Tester Says Toxins Suspected in F-22 Hypoxia Issues Nissan Creates Self-Healing iPhone Case with Automotive Coating Hulu Looks to Raise Funds for Original Programming 1/16/2011 Daily Hardware Reviews Microsoft Bans Linux/Android Dual-Booting on Windows 8 ARM Devices Twitter @NOTashwin @ryanshrout @loydcase TB can technically work with a dGPU, may require something like switchable graphics or lucid's tech @NOTashwin @ryanshrout @loydcase they should work fine, assuming TB is properly implemented. @AgentKyle hmm not off the top of my head, I'll ask around though @RisingStart absolutely, just got back in last night and it's on my to-do list for today @wapz @nerdtalker if I were Apple, I'd push for two A15s over four A9s, but I have no specific knowledge of what A6 will be @techinsidr I do believe we'll see a design win from Motorola at least, given the agreement announced at the show @PenLlawen it's a bit late, but our exchange a while ago inspired this: http://t.co/w7L0oLxM RT @anandtech: http://t.co/kJeJQML8 @alphacheez @DrPizza sometimes the easiest option is the best one :) i wish i could publish the entirety of the data @DrPizza perhaps that's a bit better, thanks for the heads up - publishing stories like that in between meetings at CES is not ideal :)  

Copyright © 1997-2011 AnandTech, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms, Conditions and Privacy Information.
Click Here for Advertising Information